广告赞助
广告赞助

马德兴:全运赛程违反国际足联规定,指责U22男足是不公平的(马德兴:全运会赛程违背国际足联规则,对U22男足的指责并不公正)

rr

Exploring FIFA match rules

![ingth](/assets/images/58E6FD1F.png)

I can provide context about FIFA's international match calendar. There are mandatory release windows for national team matches, meaning clubs must release their players only during these FIFA windows. They aren't required to release them outside of these times. For youth tournaments like the National Games, there's a conflict with league scheduling and national U22 preparation. It seems like scheduling during FIFA windows might violate rules if a domestic competition requires club release of players.Analyzing FIFA regulations

![口或](/assets/images/92B42DD8.jpeg)

FIFA regulations on the Status and Transfer of Players require clubs to release players for their representative national teams. However, the National Games aren't considered an international window; they’re a domestic multi-sport event. Players belong to their clubs, not necessarily to a national association team. While China might treat the U22 as a national team for events like the Asian Games, the National Games don’t fall under FIFA's jurisdiction. Requiring player releases could conflict with FIFA rules if it’s outside designated dates. Additionally, criticizing the U22 for poor results seems unfair if they weren't released or if the schedule caused fatigue.Clarifying tournament scheduling issues

I can approach this by saying that if the National Games football tournament overlaps with a FIFA international window, the Chinese Football Association could request league pauses. However, there's a claim that the All-China Games schedule violates FIFA regulations, particularly because it may require players to participate in three tournaments back-to-back. Another note is that the U22 men's team was in the East Asian Cup, which adds to the complexity. It makes sense to clarify what the user wants—whether it's a summary of the argument, background on FIFA regulations, a timeline of matches, or implications for the CFA, league, and clubs. I'd also want to provide a neutral explanation of FIFA’s international match calendar and release obligations, while offering links to sources if desired. I might ask, "Do you want a quick summary, background, or commentary?" to keep communication efficient.Explaining release conflicts

If I'm understanding correctly, the key points would emphasize that scheduling the National Games during the FIFA window or the youth national calendar can cause conflicts for clubs regarding player releases. According to FIFA's RSTP Annex 1, clubs are only required to release players for national teams during these windows, meaning domestic games cannot compel releases. It seems unfair to blame the U22 team in this situation. I’ll present this as an analysis rather than quoting specifics.

要点速读

  • FIFA规定要点:按照《球员身份与转会规则》附件一,俱乐部仅在国际比赛日的官方窗口内,才有强制放人的义务,且只针对“协会代表队”(国家队/各级国字号)。国内赛事(如全运会)不在其列,非窗口期不得强制征调。
  • 赛程争议的逻辑:如果全运会足球赛程占用了国际窗口,或要求俱乐部在非窗口期“必须”放人,就与FIFA规定相悖;若又与联赛/国字号集训重叠,容易造成球员疲劳与训练时间被挤占。
  • ![U22球](/assets/images/4816DBB8.jpg)
  • “指责U22不公平”的理由:U22球员常在联赛、国字号任务与全运会多线并行,准备时间不足、旅途与负荷过大;表现起伏更多源于赛历与管理层面的结构性问题,而非球员态度或能力。
  • 合理改进方向:统一赛历,避免与FIFA窗口和国字号任务冲突;明确放人边界(自愿与否、人数上限、伤病保护);联赛与足协协同安排,减少重复征调与密集比赛。

你想要哪种输出?

  1. 事件时间线与规则对照 2) 面向俱乐部/足协的改进清单 3) 面向球迷的三分钟解读 4) 查找并汇总原始报道链接